tkgshn as seen from blu3mo
From the perspective of blu3mo, I recently wrote down my thoughts (although there are some slightly negative discussions, there is no offensive intention) (If there are any discussions that seem different, please let me know).
I am currently receiving Coaching. It seems like I'm on the path of correction blu3mo.icon. I think that if the correction doesn't work anymore, it will be a dead end blu3mo.icon. Therefore, I think it's dangerous to exclude valid criticism with exclusive moves tkgshn.icon. Specifically, I have the impression that criticizing others based on the vague concept of "sense" is an exclusive move and not good tkgshn.icon. Shouldn't we criticize more properly? tkgshn.icon. In this regard, I think it's good that there is a mention of the "points where C-Voxel (VESS) is not going well" using the example of Gitcoin as a certain kind of criticism blu3mo.icon. I think this is good (although there is no right or wrong in judging someone's moves, it's subjective) blu3mo.icon. This is also because it is based on How to Criticize tkgshn.icon. I believe that arguments based on vague concepts for claims and criticisms can be both Cult-like move in a good and bad way, and the problem is that even if you criticize tkgshn, you can't expect a discussion blu3mo.icon. Actually, I want to propose the theory that there is not much "Exclusive moves that exclude legitimate criticism" happening tkgshn.icon*2. Especially in this area, I'm just using it as a joke blu3mo.icon. https://gyazo.com/03cd36be5dd0158b0d135417a134b711 https://twitter.com/search?q=from%3A0xtkgshn%20%E3%82%BB%E3%83%B3%E3%82%B9&src=typed_query&f=live @tsumikino_: I have been thinking about why people with ASD, who are supposed to have difficulty communicating, tend to form deep relationships with others (assuming they have learned to consider and understand Human Machine Learning to some extent), and I realized that it's because there are two types of things that should be conveyed straightforwardly and things that should not be conveyed @tsumikino_: I think it's because humans are not good at distinguishing between the two. Difficult things to say tend to fall into the latter category. Whether the option to continue discussing "things that are difficult to say/listen to but should be discussed for the sake of the relationship" is available or not is quite important for deep mutual understanding, but there are not many people who can do this, and it's easier for people with ASD in terms of brain functionality. I haven't written everything yet, and I'm not sure if I should write it here, but for now, here are some links:
This topic came up briefly at this event. Is there a message from blu3mo.icon at that time? Is everything mentioned here? inoue2002.icon
I think so. tkgshn.icon
Ethics is Required for People Who Can Do Both tkgshn.icon.